On Sun, 2012-09-09 at 14:57 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: > > On 09/09/2012 02:05 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > >> And the answer is ... it's a gmake bug. > > > Thanks for pursuing this. Whether or not it masks the underlying > > problem, it's still something we should do, no? In fact, it seems to me > > like this makes it even less worth trying to do anything better. > > Yeah, exactly.
But then the answer could be, if you want to use parallel make, use a version that's not broken. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
