On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If the argument for moving pg_reorg into core is "faster and easier" > development, well I don't really buy that. I don't see any problem in having pg_reorg in PGXN instead. I've tried adding a META.json to the project and it seems working fine with the pgxn client. It is together with other patches in my own github fork. https://github.com/dvarrazzo/pg_reorg/ I haven't submitted it to PGXN as I prefer the original author to keep the ownership. -- Daniele -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
