On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 9:08 AM, sakamoto <dsakam...@lolloo.net> wrote:
> (2012/09/21 22:32), Michael Paquier wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Daniele Varrazzo < >> daniele.varra...@gmail.com >> <mailto:daniele.varrazzo@**gmail.com<daniele.varra...@gmail.com>>> >> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Josh Kupershmidt >> <schmi...@gmail.com <mailto:schmi...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> I haven't submitted it to PGXN as I prefer the original author to keep >> the ownership. >> >> Thanks, I merged your patches with the dev branch for the time being. >> It would be great to have some input from the maintainers of pg_reorg in >> pgfoundry to see if they agree about putting it in pgxn. >> >> Hi, I'm Sakamoto, reorg mainainer. > I'm very happy Josh, Michael and Daniele are interested in reorg. > > I'm working on the next version of reorg 1.1.8, which will be released in > a couple of days. > And I come to think that it is a point to reconsider the way to > develop/maintain. > To be honest, we have little available development resources, so no > additional > features are added recently. But features and fixes to be done (as Josh > sums up. thanks). > > I think it is a good idea to develop on github. Michael's repo is the root? > After the release of 1.1.8, I will freeze CVS repository and create a > mirror on github. > # Or Michael's repo will do :) > As you wish. You could create a root folder based on a new organization, or on your own account, or use my repo. The result will be the same. I let it at your appreciation I have received some patches from Josh, Daniele. It should be developed in > the next > major version 1.2. So some of them may not be included in 1.1.8 (caz it's > minor versionup), > but I feel so appreciated. > Great! -- Michael Paquier http://michael.otacoo.com
