Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: > On 12/02/2012 10:05 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Personally I always thought that was a feature not a bug. If we give >> each one its own DB, there will be a couple of dozen databases >> cluttering the installation at the end of "make installcheck", and no >> convenient way to get rid of them.
> How about if we have a make target to clean these databases out, > "installcheck-clean", maybe? Alternatively, or in addition, how about if > we have a separate make target to do things the way I'm suggesting, > assuming I can make that work? Either of those would satisfy my concern. The latter might be a bit easier, not sure. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers