* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > If I believed that it would be a hundred-line patch, and would *stay* > a hundred-line patch, I'd be fine with it. But it won't. I will > bet a very fine dinner that the feature wouldn't get out the door > before there would be demands for pg_dump support.
Fine, how about a function that can be called by pg_dump (and anyone
else who has the rights and feels the need) to set that value? That
avoids all need for any new syntax and still gives us the pg_dump and
friends support that will apparently be asked for.
> And arguments
> about whether ALTER should or should not change the timestamp.
There is no case where ALTER should change the *creation* time, imo.
> And I doubt you counted psql \d support in that hundred lines.
> So this is just a can of worms that I'd rather not open.
The last psql \d support change that I looked at (thanks Jon) had a
diffstat (excluding documentation and whitespace changes) of:
sfrost@beorn:/home/sfrost/Downloads> cat qq | diffstat
describe.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
Just saying. ;)
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
