Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: > On 1/1/13 6:48 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Here's a draft patch for that.
> This didn't make a difference in my test case. I might have to do some
> bisecting to find where the problem was introduced.
Could we see the test case? Or at least oprofile results for it?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
