The docs on bgworker twice refer to "HOT standby".  I don't think that in
either case, the "hot" needs emphasis, and if it does making it look like
an acronym (one already used for something else) is probably not the way to
do it.

Patch to HEAD attached.

Cheers,

Jeff
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/bgworker.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/bgworker.sgml
new file mode 100644
index 912c7de..1151161
*** a/doc/src/sgml/bgworker.sgml
--- b/doc/src/sgml/bgworker.sgml
*************** typedef struct BackgroundWorker
*** 74,84 ****
     <command>postgres</> itself has finished its own initialization; processes
     requesting this are not eligible for database connections),
     <literal>BgWorkerStart_ConsistentState</> (start as soon as a consistent state
!    has been reached in a HOT standby, allowing processes to connect to
     databases and run read-only queries), and
     <literal>BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished</> (start as soon as the system has
     entered normal read-write state).  Note the last two values are equivalent
!    in a server that's not a HOT standby.  Note that this setting only indicates
     when the processes are to be started; they do not stop when a different state
     is reached.
    </para>
--- 74,84 ----
     <command>postgres</> itself has finished its own initialization; processes
     requesting this are not eligible for database connections),
     <literal>BgWorkerStart_ConsistentState</> (start as soon as a consistent state
!    has been reached in a hot standby, allowing processes to connect to
     databases and run read-only queries), and
     <literal>BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished</> (start as soon as the system has
     entered normal read-write state).  Note the last two values are equivalent
!    in a server that's not a hot standby.  Note that this setting only indicates
     when the processes are to be started; they do not stop when a different state
     is reached.
    </para>
-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to