On 24 January 2013 07:25, Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deola...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: >> The docs on bgworker twice refer to "HOT standby". I don't think that in >> either case, the "hot" needs emphasis, and if it does making it look like an >> acronym (one already used for something else) is probably not the way to do >> it. > > I think it should it be "Hot Standby" for consistency. +1 for changing > it from HOT to hot/Hot anyway
Patch applied. Thanks -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
