On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: > The docs on bgworker twice refer to "HOT standby". I don't think that in > either case, the "hot" needs emphasis, and if it does making it look like an > acronym (one already used for something else) is probably not the way to do > it.
I think it should it be "Hot Standby" for consistency. +1 for changing it from HOT to hot/Hot anyway Thanks, Pavan -- Pavan Deolasee http://www.linkedin.com/in/pavandeolasee -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
