Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > All in all, I'm happy with this and I'm considering committing it as > soon as we agree on the set of columns. I'm mildly on the side of > removing the separate schema column and keeping name, so we'd have > type/name/identity.
I would prefer that we keep the schema column, for easier per-schema processing or filtering. It's way eaiser to provide it in a separate column than to ask people to parse it back from the identity column. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
