Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> The new identity column is amazingly verbose on things like pg_amproc entries:
> 10650 | 1 (pg_catalog.point, pg_catalog.point) of pg_catalog.point_ops for
> gist:
> pg_catalog.gist_point_consistent(pg_catalog.internal,pg_catalog.point,integer,pg_catalog.oid,pg_catalog.internal)
Uh ... isn't that confusing the *identity* of the pg_amproc entry with
its *content*? I would say that the function reference doesn't belong
there. You do need the rest. I would also suggest that you prepend
the word "function" (or "operator" for pg_amop), so that it reads like
"function 1 (typename, typename) of opfamilyname for amname".
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
