On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 22:38 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: >> > In the last two years, the first commit fest started in June, which is >> > about a month from now. If we are going to do that again, we should >> > clarify that as soon as possible. And if we are not, then we should >> > also clarify that, because some people are probably expecting that we >> > are. >> >> > So, any thoughts on the commit fest schedule, any need for deviations, >> > or same old? >> >> Usually this is settled at the PGCon developers' meeting ... > > But it doesn't have to, does it? > > If there is nothing to change then we might as well settle it here and > save the meeting for more interesting things. But if someone wants to > argue for adjustments, it'd be better to collect arguments here rather > than argue all of it out in 15 mins or so without any preparation. > > (The same goes for all agenda items in that meeting. At one point there > was a guideline to discuss items on the mailing list before the > meeting.)
+1 from me for prior discussion via email of any and all topics to be covered at the meeting. And +1 from me for keeping the same CommitFest schedule we had last year, and using the meeting time for something more interesting. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers