On 05/15/2013 10:30 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Uhm. If I've been anything wrt the 9.3 schedule, happy is not it. We > completely failed to manage it in any kind of sane way. I vote +1 for > keeping the same commitfest schedule this year, but please let's do > everyone a favor and make sure we get some more (stricter?) management > of the commitfests this time. Not closing the November commitfest in > March would be appreciated, I think.
Well, we could actually *follow* the schedule we outlined at the Developer Meeting last year, including the triage periods. I'll also say: * we need to assign CF managers at least 2 weeks in advance of each CF * we need to replace them if they get too busy to follow-through, * and the last CF needs two managers. We went pretty far off schedule this year because we didn't manage the process. Especially given the rudimentary tools we have to work with, we can't afford to do that. I'd be happy to manage the first CF on June 15th, if nobody else wants to. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
