> Shared responsibility is no-one's responsibility. If we are to have > multiple CF managers, I think it would be good to have one who's mainly > responsible, and the second one's job is to nag the first manager if > ernothing happens, and quickly take over if necessary. Ie. a hot standby > arrangement, rather than two equal CF managers.
Because, of course, we have zero experience coordinating tasks with other contributors over the internet. I agree that one CFM needs to be "senior" (there's a lot of judgement calls involved) but I don't agree that CFM needs to be a single-threaded task. Speaking of which, I still need a backup CFM for CF1. Any volunteers? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
