On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> wrote: >> I'm not sure what the resolution of Alvaro's concern was, so I left the >> flag reporting the same as the previous patch. > > Alvaro's concern was that the new flags added (those added by the > foreign key locks patch) do something cute with re-using multiple > other bits in an otherwise nonsensical combination to represent a > distinct state.
I just realized that it wasn't that you didn't understand the nature of the problem, but that you weren't sure of a resolution. Sorry for the noise. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
