Josh Kupershmidt <schmi...@gmail.com> writes:
> This patch is in the current CommitFest, does it still need to be
> reviewed? If so, I notice that the version in pgfoundry's CVS is
> rather different than the version the patch seems to have been built
> against (presumably the pg_filedump-9.2.0.tar.gz release), and
> conflicts in several places with cvs tip.
Yeah, I pushed some basic 9.3 compatibility fixes into pg_filedump CVS
a few weeks back. If someone could rebase the patch against that,
I'd appreciate it.
> Also, would anyone be willing to convert this repository to git and
> post it on github or similar?
I know it's time to get off of pgfoundry, but doing so for pg_filedump
is way down the priority list ...
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
