On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> wrote: > Attached a new diff for pg_filedump that makes use of the above change. > > I'm not sure what the resolution of Alvaro's concern was, so I left the > flag reporting the same as the previous patch.
This patch is in the current CommitFest, does it still need to be reviewed? If so, I notice that the version in pgfoundry's CVS is rather different than the version the patch seems to have been built against (presumably the pg_filedump-9.2.0.tar.gz release), and conflicts in several places with cvs tip. Also, would anyone be willing to convert this repository to git and post it on github or similar? pgfoundry is becoming increasingly difficult to use, for instance the 'Browse CVS Repository' link for pg_filedump and other projects is broken[1] and apparently has been for months[2], not to mention the general crumminess of using CVS [3]. Josh [1] http://pgfoundry.org/scm/browser.php?group_id=1000541 [2] http://pgfoundry.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=15554&forum_id=44&group_id=1000013 [3] Since the pgfoundry cvs server apparently doesn't support the 'ls' command, you might need to know this to know which module name to check out: cvs -d :pserver:anonym...@cvs.pgfoundry.org:/cvsroot/pgfiledump checkout pg_filedump -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
