Josh Berkus wrote: > -- a couple of compromise proposals were made: > > a) that reviewers who do actual code modification of the patch get > credited on the feature, and those who just review it get credited at > the bottom of the release notes, or > > b) that all "names" move to a web page on www.postgresql.org and come > out of the release notes entirely. > > Speaking as a commitfest manager, I favor compromise proposal (a), > personally. Does (a) seem somehow terrible to anyone?
I like (a) myself, though I'd amend it so that "extensive work on the patch" is required to qualify as co-author, which may or may not be code. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
