On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Greg Smith <g...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > And I can't get too excited about making this as my volunteer effort when I > consider what the resulting credit will look like. Coding is by far the > smallest part of work like this, first behind coming up with the design in > the first place. And both of those are way, way behind how long review > benchmarking takes on something like this. The way credit is distributed > for this sort of feature puts coding first, design not credited at all, and > maybe you'll see some small review credit for benchmarks. That's completely > backwards from the actual work ratio. If all I'm getting out of something > is credit, I'd at least like it to be an appropriate amount of it.
FWIW, I think that's a reasonable request. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
