On 7/25/13 6:02 PM, didier wrote:
It was surely already discussed but why isn't postresql writing sequentially its cache in a temporary file?
If you do that, reads of the data will have to traverse that temporary file to assemble their data. You'll make every later reader pay the random I/O penalty that's being avoided right now. Checkpoints are already postponing these random writes as long as possible. You have to take care of them eventually though.
-- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US [email protected] Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
