On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 6:02 PM, didier <did...@gmail.com> wrote: > It was surely already discussed but why isn't postresql writing > sequentially its cache in a temporary file? With storage random speed at > least five to ten time slower it could help a lot. > Thanks
Sure, that's what the WAL does. But you still have to checkpoint eventually. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
