2013/8/23 David E. Wheeler <da...@justatheory.com>

> On Aug 23, 2013, at 8:51 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > it is about a personal taste - if you prefer more verbose or less
> verbose languages.
> >
> > I feeling a PERFORM usage as something special and you example is nice
> case, where I am think so PERFORM is good for verbosity.
>
> I really do not see the point of PERFORM in the current implementation of
> PL/pgSQL. If we were to allow SELECT to run when it is not returning a
> value or selecting into a variable, it would be unambiguous, since the
> other two cases require:
>
> * Using RETURN (or RETURN QUERY)
> * The INTO clause
>
> I have come around to the position that I think Tom, Josh, and Merlin have
> all put forward, that PERFORM is unnecessary.
>
> Unless Jan chimes in with something the rest of us have missed, it’s
> starting to feel like a consensus to me, other than your objections, of
> course.
>
>
ook

Regards

Pavel


> Best,
>
> David
>
>

Reply via email to