On 2013-08-23 22:02, Josh Berkus wrote:
On 08/23/2013 11:30 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
2013/8/23 Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com>
Pavel,
But it can have a different reason. In T-SQL (Microsoft or Sybase) or
MySQL
a unbound query is used to direct transfer data to client side.
Are you planning to implement that in PL/pgSQL?
yes. I would to see a stored procedures with this functionality in pg
Is there some reason we wouldn't use RETURN QUERY in that case, instead
of SELECT? As I said above, it would be more consistent with existing
PL/pgSQL.
How would using the same syntax to do an entirely different thing be
consistent?
Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
