Marko Tiikkaja wrote: > On 2013-09-14 00:39, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >>set plpgsql.print_strict_params to true; > > > >Hmm, shouldn't this be a compile option? See the "comp_option" > >production in pl_gram.y for existing examples. > > I thought about that, but it seemed more like a runtime option to > me. Any particular reason you think it would be better as a compile > time option?
Seems like something that would be useful to change per function, rather than globally, no? -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
