Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > > It seems all of this discussion misses the point. Either it has a large > > > amount of impact and the idea gets rejected because of implementation > > > issues, or it has little impact but it's nothing the core group wants to > > > implement. If the problem is finding someone to implement it, it sounds > > > like Justin has found such a person, so are we going to stand in his way > > > while we wax poetic about OS religion and corporate philosophies or can > > > he start submitting patches? > > > > Actually, the work is minimal. Look at the commit I used to remove > > PGXLOG, trim that to remove the changes to make the path name dynamic in > > size (added too much complexity for little benefit) and hang the path > > coding off a GUC variable rather than an environment variable. > > I personally don't see the problem with a GUC variable...that seems like the > perfect solution to me...
Well, let's see if we ever run on native NT4.X and we can decide then. Actually, don't our Cygnus folks have a problem with moving pg_xlog already? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
