On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> In fact, I tried to open a dialog with you on this issue several times, > but when I got no reply, I had to remove PGXLOG. If we had continued > discussion, we might have come up with the GUC compromise. Ya know, I'm sitting back and reading this, and other threads, and assimilating what is being bantered about, and start to think that its time to cut back on the gatekeepers ... Thomas implemented an option that he felt was useful, and that doesn't break anything inside of the code ... he provided 2 methods of being able to move the xlog's to another location (through command line and environment variable, both of which are standard methods for doing such in server software) ... but, because a small number of ppl "voted" that it should go away, it went away ... You don't :vote: on stuff like this ... if you don't like it, you just don't use it ... nobody is forcing you to do so. If you think there are going to be idiots out here that aren't going to use it right, then you document it appropriately, with *strong* wording against using it ... ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]