Robert Treat wrote: > It seems all of this discussion misses the point. Either it has a large > amount of impact and the idea gets rejected because of implementation > issues, or it has little impact but it's nothing the core group wants to > implement. If the problem is finding someone to implement it, it sounds > like Justin has found such a person, so are we going to stand in his way > while we wax poetic about OS religion and corporate philosophies or can > he start submitting patches?
Well, I have Win32 patches here I am reviewing. I think I can say that the changes are minimal and probably will be accepted for addition into 7.4. I am actually surprised at how little is required. Right now, 7.4 is targeted with point-in-time recovery and Win32. And, in fact, both patches are almost ready for inclusion into CVS, so we may find that 7.4 has a very short release cycle. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
