On 9/25/13 5:31 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Attached is a new version, which adds that field to HeapTupleData. Most
> of the issues on you listed above have been fixed, plus a bunch of other
> bugs I found myself. The bug that Jeff ran into with his count.pl script
> has also been fixed.

This patch doesn't apply at all:

Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assuming -R.
1 out of 39 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c.rej
5 out of 9 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
src/backend/access/heap/rewriteheap.c.rej
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assuming -R.
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assuming -R.
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assuming -R.
10 out of 12 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c.rej
13 out of 18 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
src/backend/commands/cluster.c.rej
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assuming -R.
15 out of 17 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
src/backend/commands/vacuum.c.rej
5 out of 24 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
src/backend/commands/vacuumlazy.c.rej
3 out of 9 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
src/backend/postmaster/autovacuum.c.rej
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assuming -R.
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assuming -R.
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assuming -R.
1 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c.rej
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assuming -R.
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assuming -R.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
src/include/commands/cluster.h.rej
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
src/include/commands/vacuum.h.rej
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assuming -R.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to