* Andres Freund (and...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > FWIW, argv0 is pretty much guaranteed to be shorter than MAXPGPATH since > MAXPGPATH is the longest a path can be, and argv[0] is either the executable's > name (if executed via PATH) or the path to the executable.
Err, it's the longest that *we* think the path can be.. That's not the same as actually being the longest that a path can be, which depends on the filesystem and OS... It's not hard to get past our 1024 limit: sfrost@beorn:/really/long/path> echo $PWD | wc -c 1409 > Now, you could probably write a program to exeve() a binary with argv[0] > being longer, but in that case you can also just put garbage in there. We shouldn't blow up in that case either, really. Thanks, Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature