Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > This code should probably be using namecpy(). Note namecpy() > doesn't memset() after strncpy() and has survived the test of > time, which strongly suggests that the memset is indeed > superfluous.
That argument would be more persuasive if I could find any current usage of the namecpy() function anywhere in the source code. -- Kevin Grittner EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
