On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 04:51:14PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:
> >> Seems broadly reasonable, but I'd use "no other effect" throughout.
> >
> > That sounds awkward, e.g.:
> >
> > Issuing <command>ROLLBACK</> outside of a transaction
> > block emits a warning but has no other effect.
> >
> > I could live with this:
> >
> > Issuing <command>ROLLBACK</> outside of a transaction
> > block has no effect except emitting a warning.
>
> I prefer the first version, but that's obviously a judgement call.
How about:
Issuing <command>ROLLBACK</> outside of a transaction
block has the sole effect of emitting a warning.
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
