2013/12/14 0:14 "Tom Lane" <[email protected]>: > > Heikki Linnakangas <[email protected]> writes: > > I'm not totally satisfied with the name of the GUC, wal_log_hintbits. > > Me either; at the very least, it's short an underscore: wal_log_hint_bits > would be more readable. But how about just "wal_log_hints"? >
+1 too. it's readble. Masahiko Sawada
