Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Does anybody have an opinion about introducing generic pseudotype IO
> functions?
Yes: -1.
> Pseudotype.c/pg_proc.h are slowly growing a number of pretty
> useless/redundant copy&pasted functions... Most for cases that are
> pretty damn unlikely to be hit by users not knowing what they do.
That's hardly the largest cost associated with inventing a new pseudotype.
Nor are there lots of new pseudotypes coming down the pike, anyway.
> What about adding a pseudotype_in/out that just error out with a generic
> message?
This will break some of the function sanity checks in opr_sanity,
I believe. Yeah, we could lobotomize that, but I don't see any benefit.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
