Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > I think I am less concerned about pseudotypes.c than about bloating > pg_proc.h even further and about the annoyance of editing it - but I > guess that should rather be fixed by storing it in a more sensible > format at some point...
Yeah, getting rid of a dozen pseudotype I/O functions is hardly going to reduce the PITA factor of editing pg_proc.h. It's interesting to think about moving all those DATA() macros into some more-maintainable format --- I'm not sure what it should be exactly, but I think something that can insert plausible defaults for omitted columns would be a big help for pg_proc and maybe some of the other catalogs too. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers