On 1/6/14, 10:29 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Pseudotype.c/pg_proc.h are slowly growing a number of pretty >> useless/redundant copy&pasted functions... Most for cases that are >> pretty damn unlikely to be hit by users not knowing what they do. > > That's hardly the largest cost associated with inventing a new pseudotype. > Nor are there lots of new pseudotypes coming down the pike, anyway.
If someone wants to do the work, what's the harm in reducing some code redundancy? >> What about adding a pseudotype_in/out that just error out with a generic >> message? > > This will break some of the function sanity checks in opr_sanity, Then the tests can be changed. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
