yes
Joe
Sent with AquaMail for Android
http://www.aqua-mail.com
On January 16, 2014 2:32:55 PM Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote:
On 12/07/2013 05:50 PM, Joe Conway wrote:
> On 12/07/2013 05:41 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
> >> On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Michael Paquier >>
<michael.paqu...@gmail.com <mailto:michael.paqu...@gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> IMHO is more elegant create a procedure to encapsulate the code
>>>> to avoid redundancy.
>>> Yep, perhaps something like PQsetClientEncodingIfDifferent or
>>> similar would make sense.
> >> Well I think at this first moment we can just create a procedure
>> inside the dblink contrib and not touch in libpq.
> Maybe a libpq function could be done for 9.4, but not for back branches.
> I don't think it makes sense to create a new function in dblink either
> -- we're only talking about two lines of added redundancy which is
> less lines of code than a new function would add. But if we create
> PQsetClientEncodingIfDifferent() (or whatever) we can remove those
> extra lines in 9.4 ;-)
Hey, since we're about to do 9.3.3: was this patch ever committed?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
