On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Christian Kruse <christ...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > what do you think about the approach the attached patch implements? > I'm not really sure if this is what you had in mind, especially if > this is the right lock.
The attached patch seems not to be attached, but the right lock to use would be the same one BackendIdGetProc() is using. I'd add a new function BackendIdGetTransactionIds or something like that. >> I also note that the docs seem to need some copy-editing: >> >> + <entry>The current <xref linked="ddl-system-columns">xmin >> value.</xref></entry> The link shouldn't include the period, and probably should also not include the word "value". I would make only the word "xmin" part of the link. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
