Hi, On 31/01/14 11:24, Robert Haas wrote: > > what do you think about the approach the attached patch implements? > > I'm not really sure if this is what you had in mind, especially if > > this is the right lock. > > The attached patch seems not to be attached, […]
*sighs* I'm at FOSDEM right now, I will send it as soon as I'm back home. > […] but the right lock to use would be the same one > BackendIdGetProc() is using. I'd add a new function > BackendIdGetTransactionIds or something like that. Good – that's exactly what I did (with a slightly different naming). > >> I also note that the docs seem to need some copy-editing: > >> > >> + <entry>The current <xref linked="ddl-system-columns">xmin > >> value.</xref></entry> > > The link shouldn't include the period, and probably should also not > include the word "value". I would make only the word "xmin" part of > the link. Thanks for elaboration. Best regards, -- Christian Kruse http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
pgpkstlLLohOH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
