Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 02/12/2014 07:22 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> So the early returns from currawong are interesting:
> Great, that's what I was hoping to see - proper errors where we've > omitted things, not silent miscompilation. Well, before you get too optimistic about that benighted platform ... mastodon just reported in on this patch, and it's showing a *different* set of unresolved symbols than currawong is. None of them are a surprise exactly, but nonetheless, why didn't currawong find the postgres_fdw issues? It still seems there's something unexplained here. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers