On 02/12/2014 08:30 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> On 02/12/2014 07:22 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> So the early returns from currawong are interesting: > >> Great, that's what I was hoping to see - proper errors where we've >> omitted things, not silent miscompilation. > > Well, before you get too optimistic about that benighted platform ... > mastodon just reported in on this patch, and it's showing a *different* > set of unresolved symbols than currawong is. None of them are a > surprise exactly, but nonetheless, why didn't currawong find the > postgres_fdw issues? > > It still seems there's something unexplained here.
Looks like currawong doesn't build postgres_fdw. -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
