On 02/11/2014 08:04 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 02/12/2014 08:30 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
On 02/12/2014 07:22 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
So the early returns from currawong are interesting:
Great, that's what I was hoping to see - proper errors where we've
omitted things, not silent miscompilation.
Well, before you get too optimistic about that benighted platform ...
mastodon just reported in on this patch, and it's showing a *different*
set of unresolved symbols than currawong is. None of them are a
surprise exactly, but nonetheless, why didn't currawong find the
postgres_fdw issues?
It still seems there's something unexplained here.
Looks like currawong doesn't build postgres_fdw.
It sure used to:
<http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=currawong&dt=2014-02-03%2005%3A30%3A00&stg=make>
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
