> On Apr 22, 2014, at 5:07 PM, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: > > >> On 04/22/2014 06:43 PM, Mark Wong wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Joshua D. Drake <j...@commandprompt.com >> <mailto:j...@commandprompt.com>> wrote: >> >> >> On 04/22/2014 08:26 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> >> I'm going away tomorrow for a few days R&R. when I'm back next >> week I >> will set up a demo client running this module. If you can have >> a machine >> prepped for this purpose by then so much the better, otherwise >> I will >> have to drag out a box I recently rescued and have been >> waiting for >> something to use it with. It's more important that it's stable >> (i.e. >> nothing else running on it) than that it's very powerful. It >> could be >> >> running Ubuntu or some Redhattish variant or, yes, even FreeBSD. >> >> >> This is best handled by Mark. Mark can you help Andrew with this? >> I assume we would use the DL385 with the MS70? >> >> >> Yeah, I can help. But let me know if Alfred's offer is preferred. > > > I don't think they are mutually exclusive, but I'd rather start off with one > machine. I would find it easiest if it were on something like CentOS6.5. > > When we have that running and reporting like we want it we can add a FreeBSD > server. > > The idea is that these machines would be available for a long time, ideally > quite a few years. We want to have them with a stable time series of > performance data so that when something disturbs the performance it sticks > out like a sore thumb.
Ok, centos 6.4 is on there now, I'll try to get that upgraded within a few days or so. I'll keep you posted. Regards, Mark -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
