JFYI we have 3 or 4 machines racked for the pgsql project in our DC. Tom informed me he would be lighting them up this week time permitting.
Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 26, 2014, at 6:15 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > > Jim, > > * Jim Nasby (j...@nasby.net) wrote: >>> On 4/22/14, 5:01 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote: >>> We also have colo space and power, etc. So this would be the whole deal. >>> The cluster would be up for as long as needed. >>> >>> Are the machine specs sufficient? Any other things we should look for? >>> >>> CC'd Tom on this email. >> >> Did anyone respond to this off-list? > > Yes, I did follow-up with Tom. I'll do so again, as the discussion had > died down. > >> Would these machines be more useful as dedicated performance test servers >> for the community or generic BenchFarm members? > > I don't believe they would be terribly useful as buildfarm systems; we > could set up similar systems with VMs to just run the regression tests. > Where I see these systems being particularly valuable would be as the > start of our performance farm, and perhaps one of the systems as a PG > infrastructure server. > > Thanks! > > Stephen -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
