On 2014-06-05 14:12:31 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 06/05/2014 01:57 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > >On 2014-06-05 10:57:58 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > >We have: > >* pg_ldecoding (Heikki) > >* pg_lcse or pg_lcset (Petr) > >* pg_logical (Andres) > > > >I like, what a surprise, my own suggestion best. The name seems more > >versatile because it's not restricted to decoding. > > The problem with pg_logical is that it's not restricted to much at all ;-), > "logical" is an awfully generic name.
So is base/, global/, pg_stat/,... I don't think we need uber-descriptive names here. I do think it's descriptive enough that unrelated data won't be looked for in there. And imo that's the case. > BTW, the stuff that we have in pg_llog are not really logs at all, so > pg_llog was always a misnomer. I'm not fighting for it :). Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
