On 05/06/14 19:56, Andres Freund wrote:
On June 5, 2014 7:43:06 PM CEST, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
Robert Haas wrote:
For my part, I'd strongly prefer a name based on the term "logical
decoding".
There is no reason not to use long names, so I think
pg_logical_decoding
is fine.
+1
Still not a fan oft having decoding in the name. I've at least one patch
pending (replication identifiers, submitted a couple months back) that will
need to stash a couple of files somewhere. And it's for the apply side, not the
decoding side.
Personally I like your suggestion of pg_logical
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
