On June 5, 2014 7:43:06 PM CEST, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> Robert Haas wrote: >>> For my part, I'd strongly prefer a name based on the term "logical >>> decoding". > >> There is no reason not to use long names, so I think >pg_logical_decoding >> is fine. > >+1
Still not a fan oft having decoding in the name. I've at least one patch pending (replication identifiers, submitted a couple months back) that will need to stash a couple of files somewhere. And it's for the apply side, not the decoding side. Andres -- Please excuse brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone. Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
