Joe Conway wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 06/18/2014 08:50 PM, Joe Conway wrote: > > On 06/18/2014 08:45 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Well, we usually think memory leaks are back-patchable bugs. I'm > >> a bit worried about the potential performance impact of an extra > >> memory context creation/deletion though. It's probably not > >> noticeable in this test case, but that's just because dblink() > >> is such a spectacularly expensive function. > > > > Probably so. I'll try to scrounge up some time to test the > > performance impact of your patch. > > Not the most scientific of tests, but I think a reasonable one:
Is this an assert-enabled build? -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
