On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Arthur Silva <arthur...@gmail.com> wrote: > The difference is small but I's definitely faster, which makes sense since > cache line misses are probably slightly reduced. > As in the previous runs, I ran the query a dozen times and took the average > after excluding runs with a high deviation.
I'm not surprised that it hasn't beaten HEAD. I haven't studied the problem in detail, but I don't think that the "cache awareness" of the new revision is necessarily a distinct advantage. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
