On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Kevin Grittner <kgri...@ymail.com> wrote: > It was actually rather disappointing to hear that we had a > conforming implementation and changed away from it circa the 7.2 > release; and even more disturbing to hear that decision is still > being defended on the grounds that there's no point providing > standard conforming behavior if we can think of different behavior > that we feel is more useful. We should have both.
I don't think the behaviour was standards-compliant in 7.2 either. For that matter, I can't think of any circumstance where the standard behaviour is useful. There's absolutely no way to write correct code using it. -- greg -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
