On 8/29/14 11:27 AM, Greg Stark wrote: > You know... I wonder if we have enough leverage in the standards > committee these days that we could usefully push that direction > instead of being pushed around. The standard timestamp with time zone > is not very useful and I'm sure the standards committee wouldn't mind > having a useful point-in-time data type.
Not likely unless Oracle or IBM have an existing implementation. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers