On 8/29/14 11:27 AM, Greg Stark wrote:
> You know... I wonder if we have enough leverage in the standards
> committee these days that we could usefully push that direction
> instead of being pushed around. The standard timestamp with time zone
> is not very useful and I'm sure the standards committee wouldn't mind
> having a useful point-in-time data type.

Not likely unless Oracle or IBM have an existing implementation.



-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to